MM2 Aim Trainer vs +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
MM2 Aim Trainer currently leads with 1,491 concurrent players against 330, a 4.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! at 4,967 concurrent players, versus 2,575. Momentum favours MM2 Aim Trainer: -3.5% week over week versus -71.8% for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!. Lifetime, MM2 Aim Trainer has more visits (893.1M vs 6.6M). Full side-by-side history for MM2 Aim Trainer and +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! is charted above.
🔨 MM2 Aim Trainer
1,491
playing now
2,079 24h peak · 893.1M visits
VS
+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
330
playing now
356 24h peak · 6.6M visits
Player count history
MM2 Aim Trainer+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
Head to head
| Metric | MM2 Aim Trainer | +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,491 | 330 | 1,161 (4.5×) |
| 24h peak | 2,079 | 356 | 1,723 (5.8×) |
| 24h average | 1,488 | 260 | 1,228 (5.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,551 | 2,222 | 329 |
| 7-day average | 1,566 | 730 | 836 (2.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,551 | 3,759 | 1,208 |
| All-time peak | 2,575 | 4,967 | 2,392 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 6.2% | ▼ 30.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 3.5% | ▼ 71.8% | — |
| Total visits | 893.1M | 6.6M | 886.5M (135.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 309.9K | 34.9K | 275K (8.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.4M | 665.1K | 1.7M (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 20.5M | 530.5K | 20M (38.7×) |
| Rating | 87.2% | 89.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,059 | #2,570 | of 7,978 |
| Trending score | -15.6 | -151.4 | — |
| Created | Jun 7, 2021 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for MM2 Aim Trainer, 11 for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!.