MM2 Aim Trainer vs Shrink Hide & Seek

Shrink Hide & Seek currently leads with 1,964 concurrent players against 1,295, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to MM2 Aim Trainer at 2,575 concurrent players, versus 2,411. Momentum favours Shrink Hide & Seek: +16.3% week over week versus -7.7% for MM2 Aim Trainer. Lifetime, MM2 Aim Trainer has more visits (893.4M vs 300.6M). Full side-by-side history for MM2 Aim Trainer and Shrink Hide & Seek is charted above.

🔨 MM2 Aim Trainer
1,295
playing now
2,222 24h peak · 893.4M visits
VS
Shrink Hide & Seek
1,964
playing now
2,411 24h peak · 300.6M visits

Player count history

MM2 Aim TrainerShrink Hide & Seek

Head to head

Metric MM2 Aim Trainer Shrink Hide & SeekDifference
Playing now1,2951,964669 (1.5×)
24h peak2,2222,411189
24h average1,4691,618149
7-day peak2,2552,411156
7-day average1,5131,364149
30-day peak2,2552,411156
All-time peak2,5752,411164
24h change 1.0% 2.5%
7d change 7.7% 16.3%
Total visits893.4M300.6M592.8M (3.0×)
Visits (24h)299.4K205K94.3K
Visits (7d)2.3M1.4M926.9K (1.7×)
Favorites20.5M221K20.3M (93.0×)
Rating87.2%76.3%
Global rank (players)#1,060#733of 8,339
Trending score-9.158.7
CreatedJun 7, 2021May 4, 2025
GenreShooterParty & Casual

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for MM2 Aim Trainer, 13 for Shrink Hide & Seek.