MM2 Aim Trainer vs Jump To Steal Slime
Jump To Steal Slime currently leads with 3,226 concurrent players against 1,883, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump To Steal Slime at 3,423 concurrent players, versus 2,251. Lifetime, MM2 Aim Trainer has more visits (890.3M vs 15.3M). Full side-by-side history for MM2 Aim Trainer and Jump To Steal Slime is charted above.
🔨 MM2 Aim Trainer
1,883
playing now
2,228 24h peak · 890.3M visits
VS
Jump To Steal Slime 🟢
3,226
playing now
3,423 24h peak · 15.3M visits
Player count history
MM2 Aim TrainerJump To Steal Slime
Head to head
| Metric | MM2 Aim Trainer | Jump To Steal Slime | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,883 | 3,226 | 1,343 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 2,228 | 3,423 | 1,195 (1.5×) |
| 24h average | 1,746 | 2,755 | 1,009 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,251 | 3,423 | 1,172 (1.5×) |
| 7-day average | 1,623 | 2,693 | 1,070 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,251 | 3,423 | 1,172 (1.5×) |
| All-time peak | 2,251 | 3,423 | 1,172 (1.5×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 30.6% | ▲ 12.9% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 890.3M | 15.3M | 875M (58.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 338.5K | 237.1K | 101.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 601.9K | 528.6K (1.9×) |
| Favorites | 20.5M | 745.1K | 19.8M (27.5×) |
| Rating | 87.2% | 83.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #817 | #491 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | 24.2 | 7.8 | — |
| Created | Jun 7, 2021 | Jun 6, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for MM2 Aim Trainer, 3 for Jump To Steal Slime.