MM2 Aim Trainer vs Animal Sim: Underwater

MM2 Aim Trainer currently leads with 1,295 concurrent players against 825, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to MM2 Aim Trainer at 2,575 concurrent players, versus 1,579. Momentum favours Animal Sim: Underwater: +5.7% week over week versus -7.7% for MM2 Aim Trainer. Lifetime, MM2 Aim Trainer has more visits (893.4M vs 265.8M). Full side-by-side history for MM2 Aim Trainer and Animal Sim: Underwater is charted above.

🔨 MM2 Aim Trainer
1,295
playing now
2,222 24h peak · 893.4M visits
VS
Animal Sim: Underwater
825
playing now
1,405 24h peak · 265.8M visits

Player count history

MM2 Aim TrainerAnimal Sim: Underwater

Head to head

Metric MM2 Aim Trainer Animal Sim: UnderwaterDifference
Playing now1,295825470 (1.6×)
24h peak2,2221,405817 (1.6×)
24h average1,4691,054415
7-day peak2,2551,579676
7-day average1,513978535 (1.5×)
30-day peak2,2551,579676
All-time peak2,5751,579996 (1.6×)
24h change 1.0% 8.8%
7d change 7.7% 5.7%
Total visits893.4M265.8M627.6M (3.4×)
Visits (24h)299.4K122.7K176.7K (2.4×)
Visits (7d)2.3M833.6K1.5M (2.8×)
Favorites20.5M226K20.3M (90.9×)
Rating87.2%84.8%
Global rank (players)#1,060#1,437of 8,339
Trending score-9.122.9
CreatedJun 7, 2021Apr 13, 2023
GenreShooterRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for MM2 Aim Trainer, 14 for Animal Sim: Underwater.