MM2 Aim Trainer vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,197 concurrent players against 2,413, a 2.2Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 5,983 concurrent players, versus 2,432. Lifetime, MM2 Aim Trainer has more visits (890.5M vs 313.6M). Full side-by-side history for MM2 Aim Trainer and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
π¨ MM2 Aim Trainer
2,413
playing now
2,432 24h peak Β· 890.5M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights π
5,197
playing now
5,832 24h peak Β· 313.6M visits
Player count history
MM2 Aim TrainerFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | MM2 Aim Trainer | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,413 | 5,197 | 2,784 (2.2Γ) |
| 24h peak | 2,432 | 5,832 | 3,400 (2.4Γ) |
| 24h average | 1,891 | 4,634 | 2,743 (2.5Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 2,432 | 5,983 | 3,551 (2.5Γ) |
| 7-day average | 1,644 | 4,324 | 2,680 (2.6Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 2,432 | 5,983 | 3,551 (2.5Γ) |
| All-time peak | 2,432 | 5,983 | 3,551 (2.5Γ) |
| 24h change | β² 14.5% | β² 13.2% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 890.5M | 313.6M | 576.9M (2.8Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 352.5K | 558.9K | 206.3K (1.6Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.4M | 2.2M | 812.2K (1.6Γ) |
| Favorites | 20.5M | 838K | 19.7M (24.5Γ) |
| Rating | 87.2% | 94.4% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #777 | #380 | of 4,573 |
| Trending score | 48.5 | 26.1 | β |
| Created | Jun 7, 2021 | Oct 27, 2022 | β |
| Genre | Shooter | Survival | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 5 days for MM2 Aim Trainer, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.