Frigid Dusk vs [Now] Catch a Monster
[Now] Catch a Monster currently leads with 9,362 concurrent players against 3,831, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Now] Catch a Monster at 30,412 concurrent players, versus 7,162. Momentum favours Frigid Dusk: +5.6% week over week versus -6.8% for [Now] Catch a Monster. Lifetime, [Now] Catch a Monster has more visits (437.5M vs 91.1M). Full side-by-side history for Frigid Dusk and [Now] Catch a Monster is charted above.
Frigid Dusk
3,831
playing now
5,661 24h peak · 91.1M visits
VS
[Now] Catch a Monster
9,362
playing now
9,362 24h peak · 437.5M visits
Player count history
Frigid Dusk[Now] Catch a Monster
Head to head
| Metric | Frigid Dusk | [Now] Catch a Monster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,831 | 9,362 | 5,531 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 5,661 | 9,362 | 3,701 (1.7×) |
| 24h average | 4,018 | 7,551 | 3,533 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,922 | 16,743 | 9,821 (2.4×) |
| 7-day average | 4,046 | 8,190 | 4,144 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,922 | 16,743 | 9,821 (2.4×) |
| All-time peak | 7,162 | 30,412 | 23,250 (4.2×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 9.6% | ▼ 7.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 5.6% | ▼ 6.8% | — |
| Total visits | 91.1M | 437.5M | 346.5M (4.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 326.4K | 678.1K | 351.7K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.3M | 5.6M | 3.3M (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 952.4K | 593.8K | 358.6K (1.6×) |
| Rating | 82.6% | 97.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #469 | #178 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | -2.5 | -30.2 | — |
| Created | Jun 6, 2021 | Nov 10, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Adventure | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Frigid Dusk, 13 for [Now] Catch a Monster.