Ronopoly vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 1,631 concurrent players against 1,131. On all-time peak the record belongs to Ronopoly at 2,978 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours Ronopoly: +44.7% week over week versus -15.6% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, Ronopoly has more visits (66.5M vs 7.3M). Full side-by-side history for Ronopoly and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

Ronopoly
1,131
playing now
1,661 24h peak · 66.5M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
1,631
playing now
1,709 24h peak · 7.3M visits

Player count history

RonopolyFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric Ronopoly FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now1,1311,631500
24h peak1,6611,70948
24h average1,2181,404186
7-day peak2,9781,7091,269 (1.7×)
7-day average1,1531,10647
30-day peak2,9781,7091,269 (1.7×)
All-time peak2,9781,7691,209 (1.7×)
24h change 12.3% 23.7%
7d change 44.7% 15.6%
Total visits66.5M7.3M59.1M (9.1×)
Visits (24h)96K189.5K93.5K (2.0×)
Visits (7d)667.2K1.1M454.9K (1.7×)
Favorites261.4K794.6K533.3K (3.0×)
Rating71.0%81.6%
Global rank (players)#1,386#1,093of 8,197
Trending score17.183.0
CreatedMay 28, 2021Apr 24, 2026
GenreStrategySimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Ronopoly, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.