Ronopoly vs Football Legends

Ronopoly currently leads with 668 concurrent players against 256, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Ronopoly at 2,978 concurrent players, versus 2,264. Momentum favours Ronopoly: +31.9% week over week versus -7.1% for Football Legends. Lifetime, Football Legends has more visits (127.7M vs 66.3M). Full side-by-side history for Ronopoly and Football Legends is charted above.

Ronopoly
668
playing now
1,537 24h peak · 66.3M visits
VS
🏈Football Legends🏈
256
playing now
1,805 24h peak · 127.7M visits

Player count history

RonopolyFootball Legends

Head to head

Metric Ronopoly Football LegendsDifference
Playing now668256412 (2.6×)
24h peak1,5371,805268
24h average998799199
7-day peak2,9782,241737
7-day average1,0501,08737
30-day peak2,9782,241737
All-time peak2,9782,264714
24h change 16.1% 13.0%
7d change 31.9% 7.1%
Total visits66.3M127.7M61.5M (1.9×)
Visits (24h)86.2K66.1K20.1K
Visits (7d)608K551.2K56.8K
Favorites261.1K90.3K170.8K (2.9×)
Rating71.0%86.5%
Global rank (players)#1,486#2,381of 7,328
Trending score-14.5-75.3
CreatedMay 28, 2021Sep 2, 2024
GenreStrategySports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Ronopoly, 11 for Football Legends.

Ronopoly vs Football Legends — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals