[] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3] vs Surf for Lucky Blocks

Surf for Lucky Blocks currently leads with 1,483 concurrent players against 493, a 3.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Surf for Lucky Blocks at 2,407 concurrent players, versus 959. Lifetime, [] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3] has more visits (117.7M vs 34.6M). Full side-by-side history for [] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3] and Surf for Lucky Blocks is charted above.

[πŸ•·οΈ] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3]
493
playing now
959 24h peak Β· 117.7M visits
VS
Surf for Lucky Blocks
1,483
playing now
2,330 24h peak Β· 34.6M visits

Player count history

[] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3]Surf for Lucky Blocks

Head to head

Metric [] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3] Surf for Lucky BlocksDifference
Playing now4931,483990 (3.0Γ—)
24h peak9592,3301,371 (2.4Γ—)
24h average6561,520864 (2.3Γ—)
7-day peak9592,3301,371 (2.4Γ—)
7-day average5761,573997 (2.7Γ—)
30-day peak9592,3301,371 (2.4Γ—)
All-time peak9592,4071,448 (2.5Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 31.5%β–Ό 7.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits117.7M34.6M83.1M (3.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)134.2K176K41.8K
Visits (7d)308.4K327.9K19.5K
Favorites394.7K1.4M997K (3.5Γ—)
Rating86.2%88.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,664#972of 4,425
Trending score37.6-10.6β€”
CreatedMay 22, 2021Mar 31, 2026β€”
GenreRPGSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for [] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3], 3 for Surf for Lucky Blocks.

[] InVision's: Web-Verse [V3] vs Surf for Lucky Blocks β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals