[1B] Boxing Beta! vs [FPS] One Tap

[FPS] One Tap currently leads with 17,103 concurrent players against 6,274, a 2.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FPS] One Tap at 19,629 concurrent players, versus 6,396. Lifetime, [1B] Boxing Beta! has more visits (1.1B vs 424.4M). Full side-by-side history for [1B] Boxing Beta! and [FPS] One Tap is charted above.

[1B] Boxing Beta! πŸ₯Š
6,274
playing now
6,396 24h peak Β· 1.1B visits
VS
[FPS] One Tap
17,103
playing now
19,629 24h peak Β· 424.4M visits

Player count history

[1B] Boxing Beta![FPS] One Tap

Head to head

Metric [1B] Boxing Beta! [FPS] One TapDifference
Playing now6,27417,10310,829 (2.7Γ—)
24h peak6,39619,62913,233 (3.1Γ—)
24h average5,55415,4379,883 (2.8Γ—)
7-day peak6,39619,62913,233 (3.1Γ—)
7-day average4,39012,9328,542 (2.9Γ—)
30-day peak6,39619,62913,233 (3.1Γ—)
All-time peak6,39619,62913,233 (3.1Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 17.7%β–² 13.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.1B424.4M668.2M (2.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)779.2K2.3M1.6M (3.0Γ—)
Visits (7d)2.9M9.3M6.4M (3.2Γ—)
Favorites3.7M475.4K3.2M (7.8Γ—)
Rating80.9%88.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#281#98of 5,050
Trending score98.881.0β€”
CreatedMay 12, 2021Dec 4, 2025β€”
GenreActionShooterβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 6 days for [1B] Boxing Beta!, 6 for [FPS] One Tap.

[1B] Boxing Beta! vs [FPS] One Tap β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals