[1B] Boxing Beta! vs [UPD!] Star Catchers

[UPD!] Star Catchers currently leads with 3,904 concurrent players against 3,530. On all-time peak the record belongs to [1B] Boxing Beta! at 6,806 concurrent players, versus 5,905. Momentum favours [UPD!] Star Catchers: +74.9% week over week versus -2.0% for [1B] Boxing Beta!. Lifetime, [1B] Boxing Beta! has more visits (1.1B vs 2.8M). Full side-by-side history for [1B] Boxing Beta! and [UPD!] Star Catchers is charted above.

[1B] Boxing Beta! πŸ₯Š
3,530
playing now
5,136 24h peak Β· 1.1B visits
VS
[UPD!] Star Catchers 🌟
3,904
playing now
5,905 24h peak Β· 2.8M visits

Player count history

[1B] Boxing Beta![UPD!] Star Catchers

Head to head

Metric [1B] Boxing Beta! [UPD!] Star CatchersDifference
Playing now3,5303,904374
24h peak5,1365,905769
24h average4,1253,209916
7-day peak5,3065,905599
7-day average4,3329813,351 (4.4Γ—)
30-day peak5,7075,905198
All-time peak6,8065,905901
24h changeβ–Ό 5.1%β–² >999%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 2.0%β–² 74.9%β€”
Total visits1.1B2.8M1.1B (389.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)601.7K479.3K122.4K
Visits (7d)4.6M587K4M (7.8Γ—)
Favorites3.8M124.4K3.7M (30.6Γ—)
Rating80.9%97.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#351#316of 8,338
Trending score-17.2776.9β€”
CreatedMay 12, 2021May 14, 2026β€”
GenreActionSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 14 days for [1B] Boxing Beta!, 9 for [UPD!] Star Catchers.