[1B] Boxing Beta! vs [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2

[UPD] ZOO or OOF 2 currently leads with 6,683 concurrent players against 4,764. On all-time peak the record belongs to [1B] Boxing Beta! at 6,806 concurrent players, versus 6,798. Momentum favours [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2: +140.3% week over week versus +8.8% for [1B] Boxing Beta!. Lifetime, [1B] Boxing Beta! has more visits (1.1B vs 3.4M). Full side-by-side history for [1B] Boxing Beta! and [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2 is charted above.

[1B] Boxing Beta! πŸ₯Š
4,764
playing now
5,079 24h peak Β· 1.1B visits
VS
[UPD] ZOO or OOF 2πŸ’₯
6,683
playing now
6,798 24h peak Β· 3.4M visits

Player count history

[1B] Boxing Beta![UPD] ZOO or OOF 2

Head to head

Metric [1B] Boxing Beta! [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2Difference
Playing now4,7646,6831,919
24h peak5,0796,7981,719
24h average4,4274,973546
7-day peak6,8066,7988
7-day average4,6032,8141,789 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak6,8066,7988
All-time peak6,8066,7988
24h changeβ–² 4.8%β–² 114.7%β€”
7d changeβ–² 8.8%β–² 140.3%β€”
Total visits1.1B3.4M1.1B (327.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)613.2K436K177.1K
Visits (7d)4.9M2M2.9M (2.5Γ—)
Favorites3.8M11K3.8M (345.6Γ—)
Rating80.9%83.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#453#325of 7,783
Trending score-13.9281.2β€”
CreatedMay 12, 2021Jul 27, 2026β€”
GenreActionParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for [1B] Boxing Beta!, 11 for [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2.