[1B] Boxing Beta! vs Jump To Steal Slime
[1B] Boxing Beta! currently leads with 3,730 concurrent players against 1,384, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [1B] Boxing Beta! at 6,806 concurrent players, versus 5,607. Momentum favours [1B] Boxing Beta!: -1.7% week over week versus -17.3% for Jump To Steal Slime. Lifetime, [1B] Boxing Beta! has more visits (1.1B vs 17.5M). Full side-by-side history for [1B] Boxing Beta! and Jump To Steal Slime is charted above.
[1B] Boxing Beta! 🥊
3,730
playing now
5,136 24h peak · 1.1B visits
VS
Jump To Steal Slime 🟢
1,384
playing now
2,708 24h peak · 17.5M visits
Player count history
[1B] Boxing Beta!Jump To Steal Slime
Head to head
| Metric | [1B] Boxing Beta! | Jump To Steal Slime | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,730 | 1,384 | 2,346 (2.7×) |
| 24h peak | 5,136 | 2,708 | 2,428 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 4,174 | 1,927 | 2,247 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 5,306 | 3,672 | 1,634 |
| 7-day average | 4,342 | 2,188 | 2,154 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 5,707 | 3,672 | 2,035 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 6,806 | 5,607 | 1,199 |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.0% | ▼ 15.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 1.7% | ▼ 17.3% | — |
| Total visits | 1.1B | 17.5M | 1.1B (62.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 622.7K | 207.9K | 414.8K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 4.6M | 1.6M | 3M (2.9×) |
| Favorites | 3.8M | 816.2K | 3M (4.7×) |
| Rating | 80.9% | 83.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #347 | #910 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | -13.9 | -38.8 | — |
| Created | May 12, 2021 | Jun 6, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Action | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for [1B] Boxing Beta!, 13 for Jump To Steal Slime.