World of Stands vs Jump Clicker

Jump Clicker currently leads with 1,490 concurrent players against 573, a 2.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump Clicker at 2,154 concurrent players, versus 1,196. Lifetime, World of Stands has more visits (286.1M vs 109.4M). Full side-by-side history for World of Stands and Jump Clicker is charted above.

World of Stands
573
playing now
1,151 24h peak Β· 286.1M visits
VS
Jump Clicker πŸš€
1,490
playing now
2,154 24h peak Β· 109.4M visits

Player count history

World of StandsJump Clicker

Head to head

Metric World of Stands Jump ClickerDifference
Playing now5731,490917 (2.6Γ—)
24h peak1,1512,1541,003 (1.9Γ—)
24h average8011,464663 (1.8Γ—)
7-day peak1,1962,154958 (1.8Γ—)
7-day average7901,504714 (1.9Γ—)
30-day peak1,1962,154958 (1.8Γ—)
All-time peak1,1962,154958 (1.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 6.4%β–² 29.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits286.1M109.4M176.7M (2.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)82.7K283.6K200.8K (3.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)240.9K885.9K645K (3.7Γ—)
Favorites537.4K8.1M7.6M (15.1Γ—)
Rating90.5%95.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,756#1,044of 4,743
Trending score3.9-8.3β€”
CreatedApr 25, 2021Feb 19, 2025β€”
GenreRPGSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for World of Stands, 4 for Jump Clicker.

World of Stands vs Jump Clicker β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals