Pick A Side vs [UPD] Derelict
[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 557 concurrent players against 352, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Derelict at 1,245 concurrent players, versus 706. Momentum favours [UPD] Derelict: -18.0% week over week versus -20.3% for Pick A Side. Lifetime, Pick A Side has more visits (401.2M vs 26.1M). Full side-by-side history for Pick A Side and [UPD] Derelict is charted above.
Pick A Side
352
playing now
536 24h peak · 401.2M visits
VS
[UPD] Derelict
557
playing now
592 24h peak · 26.1M visits
Player count history
Pick A Side[UPD] Derelict
Head to head
| Metric | Pick A Side | [UPD] Derelict | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 352 | 557 | 205 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 536 | 592 | 56 |
| 24h average | 349 | 475 | 126 |
| 7-day peak | 583 | 1,245 | 662 (2.1×) |
| 7-day average | 380 | 563 | 183 |
| 30-day peak | 703 | 1,245 | 542 (1.8×) |
| All-time peak | 706 | 1,245 | 539 (1.8×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 15.1% | ▲ 9.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 20.3% | ▼ 18.0% | — |
| Total visits | 401.2M | 26.1M | 375.1M (15.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 45.6K | 22.6K | 23K (2.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 369.9K | 244.2K | 125.7K (1.5×) |
| Favorites | 1.7M | 496.4K | 1.2M (3.4×) |
| Rating | 85.0% | 90.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,694 | #2,119 | of 8,195 |
| Trending score | -19.6 | -40.2 | — |
| Created | Feb 20, 2017 | May 29, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | RPG | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Pick A Side, 11 for [UPD] Derelict.