[1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation vs Build to Survive [TESTING]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,345 concurrent players against 2,799, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 5,986. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.0% week over week versus +15.0% for [1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation. Lifetime, [1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation has more visits (1.4B vs 268M). Full side-by-side history for [1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.

[1 DayβŒ›] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation
2,799
playing now
4,377 24h peak Β· 1.4B visits
VS
Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,345
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits

Player count history

[1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics SimulationBuild to Survive [TESTING]

Head to head

Metric [1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation Build to Survive [TESTING]Difference
Playing now2,7994,3451,546 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak4,3776,2241,847
24h average3,1654,8861,721 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak5,8417,5571,716
7-day average3,5095,1791,670
30-day peak5,8417,5571,716
All-time peak5,9867,7291,743
24h changeβ–² 1.9%β–Ό 4.8%β€”
7d changeβ–² 15.0%β–² 16.0%β€”
Total visits1.4B268M1.1B (5.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)290.4K432.4K142K
Visits (7d)2.2M3.3M1.1M (1.5Γ—)
Favorites7M5.6M1.4M
Rating93.5%96.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#550#357of 7,708
Trending score-34.1-20.8β€”
CreatedFeb 11, 2017Aug 12, 2021β€”
GenreSimulationSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for [1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation, 11 for Build to Survive [TESTING].

[1 Day] Car Crushers 2 - Physics Simulation vs Build to Survive [TESTING] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals