Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs Crazy Cards
Crazy Cards currently leads with 471 concurrent players against 92, a 5.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Crazy Cards at 784 concurrent players, versus 399. Lifetime, Crazy Cards has more visits (145.4M vs 114.9M). Full side-by-side history for Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] and Crazy Cards is charted above.
Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test]
92
playing now
399 24h peak · 114.9M visits
VS
Crazy Cards 🤣
471
playing now
620 24h peak · 145.4M visits
Player count history
Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test]Crazy Cards
Head to head
| Metric | Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] | Crazy Cards | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 92 | 471 | 379 (5.1×) |
| 24h peak | 399 | 620 | 221 (1.6×) |
| 24h average | 180 | 387 | 207 (2.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 399 | 754 | 355 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 178 | 439 | 261 (2.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 399 | 754 | 355 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 399 | 784 | 385 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.7% | ▲ 6.9% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 114.9M | 145.4M | 30.5M |
| Visits (24h) | 36.7K | 43.1K | 6.3K |
| Visits (7d) | 89.3K | 207.8K | 118.5K (2.3×) |
| Favorites | 722.6K | 479.6K | 243K (1.5×) |
| Rating | 92.6% | 82.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,088 | #1,854 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 2.3 | -29.1 | — |
| Created | Feb 22, 2021 | Dec 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs City BanNaKorean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs SUPER IMPOSSIBLE OBBYKorean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs ElevatorsKorean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs Word ConnectKorean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs Hide the BoysKorean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test] vs [Demon Slayer]Merge Anime DefenderCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Korean BBQ Restaurant [Beta Test], 5 for Crazy Cards.