Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE] vs Would you rather but it happens

Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE] currently leads with 1,146 concurrent players against 763, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE] at 1,868 concurrent players, versus 1,660. Lifetime, Would you rather but it happens has more visits (125.9M vs 28.9M). Full side-by-side history for Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE] and Would you rather but it happens is charted above.

Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE]
1,146
playing now
1,576 24h peak · 28.9M visits
VS
Would you rather but it happens
763
playing now
1,156 24h peak · 125.9M visits

Player count history

Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE]Would you rather but it happens

Head to head

Metric Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE] Would you rather but it happensDifference
Playing now1,146763383 (1.5×)
24h peak1,5761,156420
24h average1,179860319
7-day peak1,8681,651217
7-day average1,198880318
30-day peak1,8681,651217
All-time peak1,8681,660208
24h change 8.1% 14.8%
7d change
Total visits28.9M125.9M97M (4.4×)
Visits (24h)161.7K147.7K14K
Visits (7d)950.4K515.5K434.9K (1.8×)
Favorites161.7K168.7K7K
Rating83.9%78.0%
Global rank (players)#1,206#1,528of 5,522
Trending score-4.8-6.5
CreatedJan 31, 2021Jan 21, 2026
GenreSurvivalParty & Casual

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE], 5 for Would you rather but it happens.

Lurking Giants [BACKROOMS UPDATE] vs Would you rather but it happens — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals