[RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs Be A Parkour Ninja
[RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon currently leads with 88 concurrent players against 37, a 2.4Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Be A Parkour Ninja at 133 concurrent players, versus 111. Lifetime, Be A Parkour Ninja has more visits (768.2M vs 121.1M). Full side-by-side history for [RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon and Be A Parkour Ninja is charted above.
[π‘RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon
88
playing now
102 24h peak Β· 121.1M visits
VS
Be A Parkour Ninja
37
playing now
133 24h peak Β· 768.2M visits
Player count history
[RADAR] Military Warfare TycoonBe A Parkour Ninja
Head to head
| Metric | [RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon | Be A Parkour Ninja | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 88 | 37 | 51 (2.4Γ) |
| 24h peak | 102 | 133 | 31 |
| 24h average | 66 | 72 | 6 |
| 7-day peak | 102 | 133 | 31 |
| 7-day average | 63 | 65 | 2 |
| 30-day peak | 102 | 133 | 31 |
| All-time peak | 111 | 133 | 22 |
| 24h change | βΌ 2.9% | β² 5.9% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 121.1M | 768.2M | 647.1M (6.3Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 6K | 15.3K | 9.3K (2.6Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 23.6K | 32.8K | 9.2K |
| Favorites | 618.7K | 3.5M | 2.9M (5.7Γ) |
| Rating | 83.6% | 88.2% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #2,872 | #3,288 | of 4,423 |
| Trending score | 6.4 | 14.9 | β |
| Created | Sep 18, 2011 | Feb 27, 2014 | β |
| Genre | Simulation | Action | β |
Other comparisons
[RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs [Money X2] Sword Upgrade[RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs Secure the School[RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs Pet Simulator![RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs Lunar Will - Superhero RP[RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs Georgia Roleplay [BETA][RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon vs ThreadvilleCompare two other games β
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 5 days for [RADAR] Military Warfare Tycoon, 3 for Be A Parkour Ninja.