Twisted [BETA] vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 4,341 concurrent players against 2,536, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 4,143. Momentum favours Twisted [BETA]: -5.0% week over week versus -12.2% for FNAF: Eternal Nights. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (318.3M vs 182.4M). Full side-by-side history for Twisted [BETA] and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
Twisted [BETA]
2,536
playing now
3,697 24h peak · 182.4M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
4,341
playing now
6,106 24h peak · 318.3M visits
Player count history
Twisted [BETA]FNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Twisted [BETA] | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,536 | 4,341 | 1,805 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 3,697 | 6,106 | 2,409 (1.7×) |
| 24h average | 2,873 | 4,327 | 1,454 (1.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,697 | 6,106 | 2,409 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 2,562 | 3,835 | 1,273 |
| 30-day peak | 3,697 | 6,106 | 2,409 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 7,002 | 2,859 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 0.6% | ▲ 8.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.0% | ▼ 12.2% | — |
| Total visits | 182.4M | 318.3M | 136M (1.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 310.4K | 544.3K | 233.8K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.1M | 3.8M | 1.7M (1.8×) |
| Favorites | 537.4K | 850.1K | 312.7K (1.6×) |
| Rating | 90.3% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #602 | #329 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 41.6 | 46.4 | — |
| Created | Dec 30, 2020 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Twisted [BETA], 14 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.