100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs Rich or Poor
Rich or Poor currently leads with 871 concurrent players against 548, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! at 895 concurrent players, versus 874. Lifetime, 100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! has more visits (80.5M vs 49.1M). Full side-by-side history for 100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! and Rich or Poor is charted above.
100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! 💯
548
playing now
798 24h peak · 80.5M visits
VS
Rich or Poor
871
playing now
874 24h peak · 49.1M visits
Player count history
100 Player Mega Hide and Seek!Rich or Poor
Head to head
| Metric | 100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! | Rich or Poor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 548 | 871 | 323 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 798 | 874 | 76 |
| 24h average | 484 | 625 | 141 |
| 7-day peak | 818 | 874 | 56 |
| 7-day average | 545 | 483 | 62 |
| 30-day peak | 818 | 874 | 56 |
| All-time peak | 895 | 874 | 21 |
| 24h change | ▼ 11.7% | ▲ 48.5% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 80.5M | 49.1M | 31.5M (1.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 60.7K | 79.9K | 19.2K |
| Visits (7d) | 162K | 265.8K | 103.8K (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 48.6K | 4.9M | 4.9M (101.0×) |
| Rating | 80.8% | 73.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,111 | #1,648 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | -28.8 | 78.3 | — |
| Created | Dec 9, 2020 | Sep 12, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs Build and Destroy [2 Player Obby]100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs DONATE MODDED X100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs Star Catchers100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs KiWAMiMU Wallhop Tower100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs [2x EXP ] Dungeon Leveling Origin100 Player Mega Hide and Seek! vs Tail Battles [Alpha]Compare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for 100 Player Mega Hide and Seek!, 5 for Rich or Poor.