Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] vs Shrink Hide & Seek

Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] currently leads with 5,127 concurrent players against 1,330, a 3.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] at 8,654 concurrent players, versus 2,106. Momentum favours Shrink Hide & Seek: +18.0% week over week versus +7.7% for Infectious Smile [SUMMER ]. Lifetime, Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] has more visits (1.3B vs 300.2M). Full side-by-side history for Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] and Shrink Hide & Seek is charted above.

Infectious Smile [SUMMER 🌞]
5,127
playing now
7,178 24h peak Β· 1.3B visits
VS
Shrink Hide & Seek
1,330
playing now
2,033 24h peak Β· 300.2M visits

Player count history

Infectious Smile [SUMMER ]Shrink Hide & Seek

Head to head

Metric Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] Shrink Hide & SeekDifference
Playing now5,1271,3303,797 (3.9Γ—)
24h peak7,1782,0335,145 (3.5Γ—)
24h average5,8591,4174,442 (4.1Γ—)
7-day peak8,5092,0476,462 (4.2Γ—)
7-day average6,1721,3174,855 (4.7Γ—)
30-day peak8,5092,0476,462 (4.2Γ—)
All-time peak8,6542,1066,548 (4.1Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 4.3%β–² 3.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 7.7%β–² 18.0%β€”
Total visits1.3B300.2M975.5M (4.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)648.6K182.8K465.8K (3.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)4.9M1.3M3.6M (3.7Γ—)
Favorites2.2M220.4K1.9M (9.8Γ—)
Rating78.7%76.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#292#1,052of 7,707
Trending score-19.023.5β€”
CreatedNov 21, 2020May 4, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Infectious Smile [SUMMER ], 11 for Shrink Hide & Seek.

Infectious Smile [SUMMER ] vs Shrink Hide & Seek β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals