[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs TRADE or Keep
TRADE or Keep currently leads with 665 concurrent players against 291, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to TRADE or Keep at 841 concurrent players, versus 536. Lifetime, [SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki has more visits (77.5M vs 14.6M). Full side-by-side history for [SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki and TRADE or Keep is charted above.
[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki
291
playing now
536 24h peak · 77.5M visits
VS
TRADE or Keep
665
playing now
841 24h peak · 14.6M visits
Player count history
[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project BakiTRADE or Keep
Head to head
| Metric | [SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki | TRADE or Keep | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 291 | 665 | 374 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 536 | 841 | 305 (1.6×) |
| 24h average | 296 | 599 | 303 (2.0×) |
| 7-day peak | 536 | 841 | 305 (1.6×) |
| 7-day average | 263 | 373 | 110 |
| 30-day peak | 536 | 841 | 305 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 536 | 841 | 305 (1.6×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 23.3% | ▲ 111.7% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 77.5M | 14.6M | 62.9M (5.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 12.5K | 69.3K | 56.8K (5.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 24K | 182.7K | 158.8K (7.6×) |
| Favorites | 197.7K | 15.9K | 181.8K (12.4×) |
| Rating | 79.9% | 71.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,127 | #1,521 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | 28.5 | 158.1 | — |
| Created | Nov 13, 2020 | Jun 13, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Action | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs プラズマ【日本RP】[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs The Eternal Abyss[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs Paint ANY Anime![SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs Race Clicker[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs Ice Tycoon 2[SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki vs Sinking Ship SimulatorCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for [SUMMER + x2 WEEK] Project Baki, 4 for TRADE or Keep.