Color Block vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,359 concurrent players against 1,535, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,525. Momentum favours Color Block: +6.5% week over week versus +4.7% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Color Block has more visits (2.7B vs 268.9M). Full side-by-side history for Color Block and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Color Block
1,535
playing now
1,918 24h peak · 2.7B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,359
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
Player count history
Color BlockBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Color Block | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,535 | 4,359 | 2,824 (2.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,918 | 6,794 | 4,876 (3.5×) |
| 24h average | 1,450 | 5,130 | 3,680 (3.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,382 | 6,794 | 4,412 (2.9×) |
| 7-day average | 1,449 | 4,988 | 3,539 (3.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,382 | 6,794 | 4,412 (2.9×) |
| All-time peak | 2,525 | 7,729 | 5,204 (3.1×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 11.4% | ▲ 4.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 6.5% | ▲ 4.7% | — |
| Total visits | 2.7B | 268.9M | 2.4B (9.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 250.1K | 475.4K | 225.2K (1.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.9M | 3.2M | 1.2M (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 2.6M | 5.6M | 3M (2.2×) |
| Rating | 84.6% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #933 | #352 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 0.2 | 10.5 | — |
| Created | Nov 7, 2020 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Party & Casual | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Color Block, 12 for Build to Survive [TESTING].