Human Simulator vs Tower Battles: Battlefront

Tower Battles: Battlefront currently leads with 65 concurrent players against 44. On all-time peak the record belongs to Tower Battles: Battlefront at 101 concurrent players, versus 95. Momentum favours Human Simulator: +13.2% week over week versus -7.8% for Tower Battles: Battlefront. Lifetime, Tower Battles: Battlefront has more visits (43M vs 31.3M). Full side-by-side history for Human Simulator and Tower Battles: Battlefront is charted above.

Human Simulator
44
playing now
95 24h peak · 31.3M visits
VS
Tower Battles: Battlefront
65
playing now
100 24h peak · 43M visits

Player count history

Human SimulatorTower Battles: Battlefront

Head to head

Metric Human Simulator Tower Battles: BattlefrontDifference
Playing now446521
24h peak951005
24h average53541
7-day peak951005
7-day average43474
30-day peak951005
All-time peak951016
24h change 23.3% 17.4%
7d change 13.2% 7.8%
Total visits31.3M43M11.7M
Visits (24h)6.6K6.2K439
Visits (7d)42K42.5K512
Favorites184.6K114.1K70.5K (1.6×)
Rating72.7%84.0%
Global rank (players)#4,500#4,003of 7,783
Trending score26.517.6
CreatedNov 1, 2020Nov 20, 2020
GenreSimulationAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Human Simulator, 12 for Tower Battles: Battlefront.