Human Simulator vs World War 3

Human Simulator currently leads with 51 concurrent players against 49. On all-time peak the record belongs to World War 3 at 129 concurrent players, versus 95. Momentum favours Human Simulator: +16.2% week over week versus -32.9% for World War 3. Lifetime, Human Simulator has more visits (31.3M vs 27.1M). Full side-by-side history for Human Simulator and World War 3 is charted above.

Human Simulator
51
playing now
95 24h peak · 31.3M visits
VS
World War 3
49
playing now
77 24h peak · 27.1M visits

Player count history

Human SimulatorWorld War 3

Head to head

Metric Human Simulator World War 3Difference
Playing now51492
24h peak957718
24h average54504
7-day peak95941
7-day average43496
30-day peak95941
All-time peak9512934
24h change 28.6% 0.0%
7d change 16.2% 32.9%
Total visits31.3M27.1M4.2M
Visits (24h)6.4K6.5K81
Visits (7d)41.9K46.8K4.9K
Favorites184.6K1.8M1.6M (9.5×)
Rating72.7%59.6%
Global rank (players)#4,123#4,223of 7,662
Trending score29.22.4
CreatedNov 1, 2020Jun 29, 2025
GenreSimulationStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Human Simulator, 10 for World War 3.

Human Simulator vs World War 3 — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals