Military VS Zombies 2 vs 2 Player Pizza Tycoon
2 Player Pizza Tycoon currently leads with 162 concurrent players against 112. On all-time peak the record belongs to 2 Player Pizza Tycoon at 212 concurrent players, versus 180. Momentum favours Military VS Zombies 2: -7.4% week over week versus -26.8% for 2 Player Pizza Tycoon. Lifetime, Military VS Zombies 2 has more visits (59.6M vs 834K). Full side-by-side history for Military VS Zombies 2 and 2 Player Pizza Tycoon is charted above.
Military VS Zombies 2
112
playing now
173 24h peak · 59.6M visits
VS
🍕2 Player Pizza Tycoon
162
playing now
188 24h peak · 834K visits
Player count history
Military VS Zombies 22 Player Pizza Tycoon
Head to head
| Metric | Military VS Zombies 2 | 2 Player Pizza Tycoon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 112 | 162 | 50 |
| 24h peak | 173 | 188 | 15 |
| 24h average | 118 | 131 | 13 |
| 7-day peak | 173 | 188 | 15 |
| 7-day average | 100 | 93 | 7 |
| 30-day peak | 173 | 197 | 24 |
| All-time peak | 180 | 212 | 32 |
| 24h change | ▲ 40.5% | ▲ 61.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 7.4% | ▼ 26.8% | — |
| Total visits | 59.6M | 834K | 58.8M (71.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 10.2K | 11.5K | 1.2K |
| Visits (7d) | 68.4K | 67K | 1.3K |
| Favorites | 113.7K | 34.1K | 79.6K (3.3×) |
| Rating | 84.8% | 96.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,888 | #3,562 | of 7,783 |
| Trending score | 30.3 | 69.2 | — |
| Created | Oct 31, 2020 | Nov 16, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Military VS Zombies 2 vs Build a Mining MachineMilitary VS Zombies 2 vs Entry Point: Freelancer's CutMilitary VS Zombies 2 vs [BIG UPD] Watch brainrot moviesMilitary VS Zombies 2 vs Crash Cars with NitroMilitary VS Zombies 2 vs Strong SimulatorMilitary VS Zombies 2 vs Interminable RpCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Military VS Zombies 2, 12 for 2 Player Pizza Tycoon.