Mermaid Testing vs Football Legends

Mermaid Testing currently leads with 1,201 concurrent players against 348, a 3.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mermaid Testing at 3,218 concurrent players, versus 2,264. Momentum favours Mermaid Testing: +6.2% week over week versus -7.0% for Football Legends. Lifetime, Mermaid Testing has more visits (680.4M vs 127.7M). Full side-by-side history for Mermaid Testing and Football Legends is charted above.

Mermaid Testing 🥭
1,201
playing now
2,260 24h peak · 680.4M visits
VS
🏈Football Legends🏈
348
playing now
1,805 24h peak · 127.7M visits

Player count history

Mermaid TestingFootball Legends

Head to head

Metric Mermaid Testing Football LegendsDifference
Playing now1,201348853 (3.5×)
24h peak2,2601,805455
24h average1,490824666 (1.8×)
7-day peak3,1662,241925
7-day average1,8061,093713 (1.7×)
30-day peak3,1662,241925
All-time peak3,2182,264954
24h change 15.4% 10.3%
7d change 6.2% 7.0%
Total visits680.4M127.7M552.7M (5.3×)
Visits (24h)259.8K66.1K193.7K (3.9×)
Visits (7d)2.1M551.3K1.6M (3.8×)
Favorites533.3K90.3K443K (5.9×)
Rating77.7%86.5%
Global rank (players)#980#2,115of 7,328
Trending score-54.8-70.3
CreatedOct 21, 2020Sep 2, 2024
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Mermaid Testing, 11 for Football Legends.

Mermaid Testing vs Football Legends — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals