Mermaid Testing vs Eat the World

Mermaid Testing currently leads with 3,058 concurrent players against 2,782. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 3,842. Momentum favours Mermaid Testing: +16.7% week over week versus -16.3% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Mermaid Testing has more visits (681.4M vs 618.6M). Full side-by-side history for Mermaid Testing and Eat the World is charted above.

Mermaid Testing πŸ₯­
3,058
playing now
3,842 24h peak Β· 681.4M visits
VS
Eat the World
2,782
playing now
3,880 24h peak Β· 618.6M visits

Player count history

Mermaid TestingEat the World

Head to head

Metric Mermaid Testing Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now3,0582,782276
24h peak3,8423,88038
24h average2,9213,229308
7-day peak3,8424,101259
7-day average2,0993,2441,145 (1.5Γ—)
30-day peak3,8424,294452
All-time peak3,8425,2611,419
24h changeβ–² 24.0%β–² 1.8%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.7%β–Ό 16.3%β€”
Total visits681.4M618.6M62.9M
Visits (24h)412.6K320.4K92.2K
Visits (7d)2.3M2.3M16.7K
Favorites535K27.9M27.3M (52.1Γ—)
Rating77.7%94.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#618#691of 8,283
Trending score134.2-1.6β€”
CreatedOct 21, 2020Feb 22, 2024β€”
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Mermaid Testing, 13 for Eat the World.