Mermaid Testing vs Meta’s Glitch Obby

Mermaid Testing currently leads with 1,220 concurrent players against 249, a 4.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mermaid Testing at 2,679 concurrent players, versus 1,154. Lifetime, Mermaid Testing has more visits (678.6M vs 19.9M). Full side-by-side history for Mermaid Testing and Meta’s Glitch Obby is charted above.

Mermaid Testing 🥭
1,220
playing now
2,181 24h peak · 678.6M visits
VS
👾 Meta’s Glitch Obby
249
playing now
629 24h peak · 19.9M visits

Player count history

Mermaid TestingMeta’s Glitch Obby

Head to head

Metric Mermaid Testing Meta’s Glitch ObbyDifference
Playing now1,220249971 (4.9×)
24h peak2,1816291,552 (3.5×)
24h average1,4943811,113 (3.9×)
7-day peak2,5821,1541,428 (2.2×)
7-day average1,6636551,008 (2.5×)
30-day peak2,5821,1541,428 (2.2×)
All-time peak2,6791,1541,525 (2.3×)
24h change 11.2% 45.2%
7d change
Total visits678.6M19.9M658.6M (34.1×)
Visits (24h)264.2K65.6K198.5K (4.0×)
Visits (7d)724.7K331.8K392.8K (2.2×)
Favorites530.1K1.3M731.5K (2.4×)
Rating77.7%67.5%
Global rank (players)#1,092#2,218of 4,425
Trending score-31.8-104.5
CreatedOct 21, 2020Dec 25, 2023
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Mermaid Testing, 5 for Meta’s Glitch Obby.

Mermaid Testing vs Meta’s Glitch Obby — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals