Cat VS Mouse vs Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

Cat VS Mouse currently leads with 657 concurrent players against 411, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] at 1,307 concurrent players, versus 945. Momentum favours Cat VS Mouse: -19.2% week over week versus -41.3% for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]. Lifetime, Cat VS Mouse has more visits (117.5M vs 3.2M). Full side-by-side history for Cat VS Mouse and Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] is charted above.

Cat VS Mouse 🐁
657
playing now
808 24h peak · 117.5M visits
VS
Virtual Football [🔓 OPEN TESTING]
411
playing now
463 24h peak · 3.2M visits

Player count history

Cat VS MouseVirtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Cat VS Mouse Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]Difference
Playing now657411246 (1.6×)
24h peak808463345 (1.7×)
24h average628339289 (1.9×)
7-day peak9351,045110
7-day average634420214 (1.5×)
30-day peak9351,307372
All-time peak9451,307362
24h change 6.3% 8.3%
7d change 19.2% 41.3%
Total visits117.5M3.2M114.3M (36.6×)
Visits (24h)93.3K64.7K28.7K
Visits (7d)747.4K680.4K67.1K
Favorites1.1M6.9K1.1M (156.0×)
Rating97.3%81.4%
Global rank (players)#2,021#2,555of 7,787
Trending score-2.5-46.3
CreatedSep 21, 2020Jan 24, 2026
GenreParty & CasualSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 8 days for Cat VS Mouse, 12 for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING].