Animal Simulator vs Build to Defend Loot

Animal Simulator currently leads with 2,630 concurrent players against 1,717, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Defend Loot at 7,220 concurrent players, versus 5,531. Momentum favours Build to Defend Loot: +3.8% week over week versus +0.7% for Animal Simulator. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 112.5M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.

Animal Simulator
2,630
playing now
5,008 24h peak · 1.6B visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
1,717
playing now
7,220 24h peak · 112.5M visits

Player count history

Animal SimulatorBuild to Defend Loot

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator Build to Defend LootDifference
Playing now2,6301,717913 (1.5×)
24h peak5,0087,2202,212
24h average3,5672,2031,364 (1.6×)
7-day peak5,0087,2202,212
7-day average3,7372,0591,678 (1.8×)
30-day peak5,0087,2202,212
All-time peak5,5317,2201,689
24h change 6.0% 4.3%
7d change 0.7% 3.8%
Total visits1.6B112.5M1.5B (14.0×)
Visits (24h)312.3K302.8K9.5K
Visits (7d)2.2M2M218.4K
Favorites1.8M97.5K1.7M (18.6×)
Rating83.6%87.1%
Global rank (players)#472#724of 8,338
Trending score-16.123.1
CreatedSep 20, 2020Jan 3, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Animal Simulator, 13 for Build to Defend Loot.