Animal Simulator vs Eat the World

Animal Simulator currently leads with 3,807 concurrent players against 3,190. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 4,853. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 615.4M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and Eat the World is charted above.

Animal Simulator
3,807
playing now
4,853 24h peak · 1.6B visits
VS
Eat the World
3,190
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.4M visits

Player count history

Animal SimulatorEat the World

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now3,8073,190617
24h peak4,8534,747106
24h average3,9273,674253
7-day peak4,8535,240387
7-day average3,5733,769196
30-day peak4,8535,240387
All-time peak4,8535,261408
24h change 19.0% 7.8%
7d change
Total visits1.6B615.4M954.2M (2.6×)
Visits (24h)309.2K384.8K75.6K
Visits (7d)998.5K1.3M324.9K
Favorites1.8M27.8M26M (15.3×)
Rating83.6%94.7%
Global rank (players)#421#497of 4,278
Trending score35.4-8.9
CreatedSep 20, 2020Feb 22, 2024
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Animal Simulator, 4 for Eat the World.

Animal Simulator vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals