Animal Simulator vs Climb Waterslide and Slide

Climb Waterslide and Slide currently leads with 4,706 concurrent players against 4,339. On all-time peak the record belongs to Climb Waterslide and Slide at 5,992 concurrent players, versus 5,370. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 30.2M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and Climb Waterslide and Slide is charted above.

Animal Simulator
4,339
playing now
5,370 24h peak · 1.6B visits
VS
Climb Waterslide and Slide
4,706
playing now
5,992 24h peak · 30.2M visits

Player count history

Animal SimulatorClimb Waterslide and Slide

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator Climb Waterslide and SlideDifference
Playing now4,3394,706367
24h peak5,3705,992622
24h average4,3614,26893
7-day peak5,3705,992622
7-day average3,6972,779918
30-day peak5,3705,992622
All-time peak5,3705,992622
24h change 8.2% 8.3%
7d change
Total visits1.6B30.2M1.5B (52.0×)
Visits (24h)345.5K390.5K45K
Visits (7d)1.3M1.1M223.7K
Favorites1.8M1.8M57.1K
Rating83.6%97.5%
Global rank (players)#439#412of 4,743
Trending score65.0192.8
CreatedSep 20, 2020Apr 13, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Animal Simulator, 4 for Climb Waterslide and Slide.

Animal Simulator vs Climb Waterslide and Slide — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals