Animal Simulator vs Decaying Winter

Animal Simulator currently leads with 3,846 concurrent players against 2,452, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Animal Simulator at 4,853 concurrent players, versus 4,077. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 74.3M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and Decaying Winter is charted above.

Animal Simulator
3,846
playing now
4,853 24h peak · 1.6B visits
VS
Decaying Winter
2,452
playing now
4,077 24h peak · 74.3M visits

Player count history

Animal SimulatorDecaying Winter

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator Decaying WinterDifference
Playing now3,8462,4521,394 (1.6×)
24h peak4,8534,077776
24h average3,9222,7451,177
7-day peak4,8534,077776
7-day average3,5732,640933
30-day peak4,8534,077776
All-time peak4,8534,077776
24h change 18.9% 14.3%
7d change
Total visits1.6B74.3M1.5B (21.1×)
Visits (24h)316.3K142.3K173.9K (2.2×)
Visits (7d)1M478.4K527.1K (2.1×)
Favorites1.8M308.8K1.5M (5.9×)
Rating83.6%91.6%
Global rank (players)#414#665of 4,278
Trending score34.913.6
CreatedSep 20, 2020May 14, 2023
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Animal Simulator, 4 for Decaying Winter.

Animal Simulator vs Decaying Winter — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals