Animal Simulator vs FNAF: Eternal Nights

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 6,297 concurrent players against 4,351. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 6,365 concurrent players, versus 5,370. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 313.7M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.

Animal Simulator
4,351
playing now
5,370 24h peak Β· 1.6B visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
6,297
playing now
6,365 24h peak Β· 313.7M visits

Player count history

Animal SimulatorFNAF: Eternal Nights

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator FNAF: Eternal NightsDifference
Playing now4,3516,2971,946
24h peak5,3706,365995
24h average4,3614,889528
7-day peak5,3706,365995
7-day average3,6974,376679
30-day peak5,3706,365995
All-time peak5,3706,365995
24h changeβ–² 8.2%β–² 22.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.6B313.7M1.3B (5.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)345.5K566.9K221.4K (1.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.3M2.3M990.5K (1.7Γ—)
Favorites1.8M838.3K972.9K (2.2Γ—)
Rating83.6%94.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#439#281of 4,743
Trending score65.043.0β€”
CreatedSep 20, 2020Oct 27, 2022β€”
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Animal Simulator, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.

Animal Simulator vs FNAF: Eternal Nights β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals