Climb 1,000 Stairs vs [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape currently leads with 4,055 concurrent players against 1,858, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape at 4,156 concurrent players, versus 2,836. Momentum favours [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape: +7.2% week over week versus -21.5% for Climb 1,000 Stairs. Lifetime, Climb 1,000 Stairs has more visits (724M vs 43.3M). Full side-by-side history for Climb 1,000 Stairs and [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape is charted above.
Climb 1,000 Stairs
1,858
playing now
2,836 24h peak · 724M visits
VS
[2X🍗] Get Fat to Break Tape 🍗
4,055
playing now
4,156 24h peak · 43.3M visits
Player count history
Climb 1,000 Stairs[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
Head to head
| Metric | Climb 1,000 Stairs | [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,858 | 4,055 | 2,197 (2.2×) |
| 24h peak | 2,836 | 4,156 | 1,320 |
| 24h average | 1,805 | 3,526 | 1,721 (2.0×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,836 | 4,156 | 1,320 |
| 7-day average | 1,214 | 2,375 | 1,161 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,836 | 4,156 | 1,320 |
| All-time peak | 2,836 | 4,156 | 1,320 |
| 24h change | ▲ 63.9% | ▲ 60.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 21.5% | ▲ 7.2% | — |
| Total visits | 724M | 43.3M | 680.7M (16.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 246.9K | 402K | 155.1K (1.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.4M | 1.9M | 484K |
| Favorites | 14.7M | 2.4M | 12.3M (6.2×) |
| Rating | 67.7% | 98.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #865 | #427 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 155.4 | 170.2 | — |
| Created | Sep 17, 2020 | May 8, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 8 days for Climb 1,000 Stairs, 12 for [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape.