Climb 1,000 Stairs vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 2,563 concurrent players against 1,684, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 3,040. Momentum favours Climb 1,000 Stairs: -10.3% week over week versus -15.5% for FNAF: Eternal Nights. Lifetime, Climb 1,000 Stairs has more visits (724.5M vs 318.4M). Full side-by-side history for Climb 1,000 Stairs and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
Climb 1,000 Stairs
1,684
playing now
3,040 24h peak · 724.5M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
2,563
playing now
6,106 24h peak · 318.4M visits
Player count history
Climb 1,000 StairsFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Climb 1,000 Stairs | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,684 | 2,563 | 879 (1.5×) |
| 24h peak | 3,040 | 6,106 | 3,066 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 2,181 | 3,613 | 1,432 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,040 | 6,106 | 3,066 (2.0×) |
| 7-day average | 1,357 | 3,691 | 2,334 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,040 | 6,106 | 3,066 (2.0×) |
| All-time peak | 3,040 | 7,002 | 3,962 (2.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 16.6% | ▼ 11.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 10.3% | ▼ 15.5% | — |
| Total visits | 724.5M | 318.4M | 406.1M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 374.1K | 525.1K | 150.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.5M | 3.7M | 2.2M (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 14.8M | 850.2K | 13.9M (17.4×) |
| Rating | 67.7% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #696 | #466 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 199.2 | -7.5 | — |
| Created | Sep 17, 2020 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Climb 1,000 Stairs, 14 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.