Bloodlines vs Global Anarchy [Early Access]

Bloodlines currently leads with 2,631 concurrent players against 515, a 5.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Global Anarchy [Early Access] at 5,630 concurrent players, versus 3,151. Momentum favours Global Anarchy [Early Access]: +218.4% week over week versus -1.5% for Bloodlines. Lifetime, Bloodlines has more visits (56.2M vs 19.3M). Full side-by-side history for Bloodlines and Global Anarchy [Early Access] is charted above.

[🐒] Bloodlines
2,631
playing now
2,745 24h peak Β· 56.2M visits
VS
πŸ’₯Global Anarchy [Early Access]
515
playing now
743 24h peak Β· 19.3M visits

Player count history

BloodlinesGlobal Anarchy [Early Access]

Head to head

Metric Bloodlines Global Anarchy [Early Access]Difference
Playing now2,6315152,116 (5.1Γ—)
24h peak2,7457432,002 (3.7Γ—)
24h average2,0595201,539 (4.0Γ—)
7-day peak3,1245,4952,371 (1.8Γ—)
7-day average1,9691,226743 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak3,1245,4952,371 (1.8Γ—)
All-time peak3,1515,6302,479 (1.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 13.0%β–Ό 38.0%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 1.5%β–² 218.4%β€”
Total visits56.2M19.3M36.9M (2.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)126.1K154K27.9K
Visits (7d)952.6K3.7M2.7M (3.9Γ—)
Favorites158.9K152.6K6.3K
Rating81.8%85.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#595#1,886of 7,126
Trending score15.0-153.7β€”
CreatedAug 16, 2020Jun 5, 2026β€”
GenreRPGShooterβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Bloodlines, 10 for Global Anarchy [Early Access].

Bloodlines vs Global Anarchy [Early Access] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals