Critical Tower Defense vs Energy Assault FPS

Energy Assault FPS currently leads with 151 concurrent players against 103. On all-time peak the record belongs to Energy Assault FPS at 222 concurrent players, versus 219. Lifetime, Energy Assault FPS has more visits (327.7M vs 78.7M). Full side-by-side history for Critical Tower Defense and Energy Assault FPS is charted above.

Critical Tower Defense
103
playing now
171 24h peak · 78.7M visits
VS
Energy Assault FPS
151
playing now
191 24h peak · 327.7M visits

Player count history

Critical Tower DefenseEnergy Assault FPS

Head to head

Metric Critical Tower Defense Energy Assault FPSDifference
Playing now10315148
24h peak17119120
24h average11113726
7-day peak2172143
7-day average1281379
30-day peak2172143
All-time peak2192223
24h change 7.5% 5.4%
7d change 6.7%
Total visits78.7M327.7M248.9M (4.2×)
Visits (24h)11.4K18K6.6K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)94.2K59.9K34.3K (1.6×)
Favorites121.6K995K873.4K (8.2×)
Rating89.3%82.2%
Global rank (players)#3,367#3,149of 7,126
Trending score-23.10.0
CreatedAug 12, 2020Jan 1, 2021
GenreStrategyShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Critical Tower Defense, 4 for Energy Assault FPS.

Critical Tower Defense vs Energy Assault FPS — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals