8-Ball Pool Classic vs [UPD] Derelict

[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 662 concurrent players against 546. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Derelict at 872 concurrent players, versus 734. Lifetime, 8-Ball Pool Classic has more visits (72.7M vs 25.8M). Full side-by-side history for 8-Ball Pool Classic and [UPD] Derelict is charted above.

🐰 8-Ball Pool Classic 🎱
546
playing now
734 24h peak Β· 72.7M visits
VS
[UPD] Derelict
662
playing now
872 24h peak Β· 25.8M visits

Player count history

8-Ball Pool Classic[UPD] Derelict

Head to head

Metric 8-Ball Pool Classic [UPD] DerelictDifference
Playing now546662116
24h peak734872138
24h average477666189
7-day peak734872138
7-day average402662260 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak734872138
All-time peak734872138
24h changeβ–² 35.5%β–² 6.1%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits72.7M25.8M46.9M (2.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)59.4K35.4K24K (1.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)184.8K41K143.8K (4.5Γ—)
Favorites169.5K490.9K321.4K (2.9Γ—)
Rating76.5%90.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,727#1,591of 4,381
Trending score47.21.6β€”
CreatedAug 8, 2020May 29, 2022β€”
GenreSports & RacingRPGβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for 8-Ball Pool Classic, 3 for [UPD] Derelict.

8-Ball Pool Classic vs [UPD] Derelict β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals