8-Ball Pool Classic vs Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]
Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] currently leads with 977 concurrent players against 429, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] at 2,250 concurrent players, versus 749. Momentum favours 8-Ball Pool Classic: +14.0% week over week versus -1.0% for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER]. Lifetime, Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] has more visits (185.9M vs 73.3M). Full side-by-side history for 8-Ball Pool Classic and Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | 8-Ball Pool Classic | Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 429 | 977 | 548 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 723 | 1,708 | 985 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 506 | 1,225 | 719 (2.4×) |
| 7-day peak | 749 | 1,896 | 1,147 (2.5×) |
| 7-day average | 473 | 1,295 | 822 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 749 | 2,071 | 1,322 (2.8×) |
| All-time peak | 749 | 2,250 | 1,501 (3.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 8.6% | ▼ 5.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 14.0% | ▼ 1.0% | — |
| Total visits | 73.3M | 185.9M | 112.5M (2.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 65.4K | 195.4K | 130K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 447.2K | 1.6M | 1.1M (3.5×) |
| Favorites | 170.1K | 524.6K | 354.5K (3.1×) |
| Rating | 76.5% | 74.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,930 | #1,140 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 18.0 | -16.4 | — |
| Created | Aug 8, 2020 | Jun 22, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for 8-Ball Pool Classic, 14 for Chained Together [2-3-4-5 PLAYER].