Tower FL vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,617 concurrent players against 890, a 5.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,071. Momentum favours Tower FL: +16.5% week over week versus +5.2% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.8M vs 229.6M). Full side-by-side history for Tower FL and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Tower FL
890
playing now
3,856 24h peak · 229.6M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,617
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.8M visits
Player count history
Tower FLBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Tower FL | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 890 | 4,617 | 3,727 (5.2×) |
| 24h peak | 3,856 | 6,794 | 2,938 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 2,056 | 5,251 | 3,195 (2.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,012 | 6,794 | 2,782 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 2,304 | 5,014 | 2,710 (2.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,012 | 6,794 | 2,782 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 4,071 | 7,729 | 3,658 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 10.3% | ▲ 6.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.5% | ▲ 5.2% | — |
| Total visits | 229.6M | 268.8M | 39.3M |
| Visits (24h) | 602.6K | 478.7K | 123.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 4.1M | 3.2M | 924.7K |
| Favorites | 163.9K | 5.6M | 5.4M (34.2×) |
| Rating | 75.8% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,393 | #342 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | -35.3 | 17.5 | — |
| Created | Aug 4, 2020 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Tower FL, 12 for Build to Survive [TESTING].