Rugby Rumble vs [TESTING] War of the Worlds

[TESTING] War of the Worlds currently leads with 776 concurrent players against 221, a 3.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Rugby Rumble at 989 concurrent players, versus 776. Lifetime, [TESTING] War of the Worlds has more visits (42.2M vs 37.6M). Full side-by-side history for Rugby Rumble and [TESTING] War of the Worlds is charted above.

Rugby Rumble
221
playing now
981 24h peak · 37.6M visits
VS
[TESTING] War of the Worlds
776
playing now
776 24h peak · 42.2M visits

Player count history

Rugby Rumble[TESTING] War of the Worlds

Head to head

Metric Rugby Rumble [TESTING] War of the WorldsDifference
Playing now221776555 (3.5×)
24h peak981776205
24h average439626187
7-day peak981776205
7-day average352621269 (1.8×)
30-day peak981776205
All-time peak989776213
24h change 12.6% 4.0%
7d change
Total visits37.6M42.2M4.6M
Visits (24h)75.7K84.8K9.1K
Visits (7d)188.2K121.1K67.1K (1.6×)
Favorites29.3K316.2K286.8K (10.8×)
Rating84.6%86.0%
Global rank (players)#2,543#1,579of 4,743
Trending score61.22.2
CreatedJul 25, 2020Oct 25, 2024
GenreSports & RacingAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Rugby Rumble, 2 for [TESTING] War of the Worlds.

Rugby Rumble vs [TESTING] War of the Worlds — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals