Centipede vs Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]
Centipede currently leads with 848 concurrent players against 411, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] at 1,307 concurrent players, versus 1,128. Momentum favours Centipede: -15.6% week over week versus -41.3% for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]. Lifetime, Centipede has more visits (410.2M vs 3.2M). Full side-by-side history for Centipede and Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] is charted above.
Centipede
848
playing now
909 24h peak · 410.2M visits
VS
Virtual Football [🔓 OPEN TESTING]
411
playing now
463 24h peak · 3.2M visits
Player count history
CentipedeVirtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Centipede | Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 848 | 411 | 437 (2.1×) |
| 24h peak | 909 | 463 | 446 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 713 | 339 | 374 (2.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 968 | 1,045 | 77 |
| 7-day average | 672 | 420 | 252 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 968 | 1,307 | 339 |
| All-time peak | 1,128 | 1,307 | 179 |
| 24h change | ▲ 16.7% | ▲ 8.3% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 15.6% | ▼ 41.3% | — |
| Total visits | 410.2M | 3.2M | 407M (127.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 119.5K | 64.7K | 54.8K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 908.7K | 680.4K | 228.4K |
| Favorites | 388.9K | 6.9K | 382K (56.4×) |
| Rating | 73.6% | 81.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,774 | #2,555 | of 7,787 |
| Trending score | 16.8 | -46.3 | — |
| Created | Jul 20, 2020 | Jan 24, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for Centipede, 12 for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING].