Centipede vs Build to Survive!

Build to Survive! currently leads with 648 concurrent players against 451. On all-time peak the record belongs to Centipede at 1,128 concurrent players, versus 1,030. Lifetime, Build to Survive! has more visits (768.4M vs 410.2M). Full side-by-side history for Centipede and Build to Survive! is charted above.

Centipede
451
playing now
909 24h peak · 410.2M visits
VS
Build to Survive!
648
playing now
1,030 24h peak · 768.4M visits

Player count history

CentipedeBuild to Survive!

Head to head

Metric Centipede Build to Survive!Difference
Playing now451648197
24h peak9091,030121
24h average62471086
7-day peak1,0771,03047
7-day average67070737
30-day peak1,0771,03047
All-time peak1,1281,03098
24h change 5.4% 3.4%
7d change 10.3%
Total visits410.2M768.4M358.2M (1.9×)
Visits (24h)123.8K63K60.8K (2.0×)
Visits (7d)926.3K268.5K657.8K (3.5×)
Favorites388.8K688.2K299.3K (1.8×)
Rating73.6%80.8%
Global rank (players)#2,100#1,705of 7,707
Trending score-18.61.2
CreatedJul 20, 2020Aug 14, 2021
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for Centipede, 6 for Build to Survive!.

Centipede vs Build to Survive! — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals