Elevators vs Run For FNAF!
Run For FNAF! currently leads with 378 concurrent players against 188, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Run For FNAF! at 466 concurrent players, versus 409. Lifetime, Elevators has more visits (113.4M vs 7.2M). Full side-by-side history for Elevators and Run For FNAF! is charted above.
Elevators
188
playing now
375 24h peak · 113.4M visits
VS
Run For FNAF!
378
playing now
466 24h peak · 7.2M visits
Player count history
ElevatorsRun For FNAF!
Head to head
| Metric | Elevators | Run For FNAF! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 188 | 378 | 190 (2.0×) |
| 24h peak | 375 | 466 | 91 |
| 24h average | 249 | 357 | 108 |
| 7-day peak | 387 | 466 | 79 |
| 7-day average | 233 | 320 | 87 |
| 30-day peak | 387 | 466 | 79 |
| All-time peak | 409 | 466 | 57 |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.1% | ▲ 14.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 2.6% | — | — |
| Total visits | 113.4M | 7.2M | 106.2M (15.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 37.8K | 42.2K | 4.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 249.8K | 169.4K | 80.4K |
| Favorites | 121.6K | 56K | 65.6K (2.2×) |
| Rating | 86.5% | 86.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,078 | #2,387 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 15.0 | 27.5 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2020 | Feb 19, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Elevators, 5 for Run For FNAF!.