[QOL] A Universal Time vs [UPD]Football Legends

[UPD]Football Legends currently leads with 1,922 concurrent players against 1,702. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD]Football Legends at 2,161 concurrent players, versus 2,005. Lifetime, [QOL] A Universal Time has more visits (988.5M vs 127.2M). Full side-by-side history for [QOL] A Universal Time and [UPD]Football Legends is charted above.

[QOL] A Universal Time
1,702
playing now
2,005 24h peak · 988.5M visits
VS
[UPD]🏈Football Legends🏈
1,922
playing now
2,161 24h peak · 127.2M visits

Player count history

[QOL] A Universal Time[UPD]Football Legends

Head to head

Metric [QOL] A Universal Time [UPD]Football LegendsDifference
Playing now1,7021,922220
24h peak2,0052,161156
24h average1,6941,419275
7-day peak2,0052,161156
7-day average1,5301,230300
30-day peak2,0052,161156
All-time peak2,0052,161156
24h change 23.9% 88.2%
7d change
Total visits988.5M127.2M861.3M (7.8×)
Visits (24h)80.9K65.6K15.2K
Visits (7d)266.9K240.7K26.2K
Favorites1.4M89.8K1.3M (15.8×)
Rating86.1%86.5%
Global rank (players)#925#852of 4,381
Trending score34.147.5
CreatedJun 3, 2020Sep 2, 2024
GenreRPGSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [QOL] A Universal Time, 5 for [UPD]Football Legends.

[QOL] A Universal Time vs [UPD]Football Legends — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals