[QOL] A Universal Time vs Web Swing for Lucky Blocks

Web Swing for Lucky Blocks currently leads with 2,192 concurrent players against 1,497. On all-time peak the record belongs to Web Swing for Lucky Blocks at 3,249 concurrent players, versus 2,005. Lifetime, [QOL] A Universal Time has more visits (988.5M vs 6.6M). Full side-by-side history for [QOL] A Universal Time and Web Swing for Lucky Blocks is charted above.

[QOL] A Universal Time
1,497
playing now
2,005 24h peak · 988.5M visits
VS
Web Swing for Lucky Blocks
2,192
playing now
2,974 24h peak · 6.6M visits

Player count history

[QOL] A Universal TimeWeb Swing for Lucky Blocks

Head to head

Metric [QOL] A Universal Time Web Swing for Lucky BlocksDifference
Playing now1,4972,192695
24h peak2,0052,974969
24h average1,6512,262611
7-day peak2,0053,2491,244 (1.6×)
7-day average1,5201,893373
30-day peak2,0053,2491,244 (1.6×)
All-time peak2,0053,2491,244 (1.6×)
24h change 18.2% 20.5%
7d change
Total visits988.5M6.6M982M (150.6×)
Visits (24h)85.7K258.1K172.4K (3.0×)
Visits (7d)280.5K893.9K613.4K (3.2×)
Favorites1.4M593.6K820.9K (2.4×)
Rating86.1%97.7%
Global rank (players)#931#693of 4,425
Trending score27.364.6
CreatedJun 3, 2020Jun 2, 2026
GenreRPGSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [QOL] A Universal Time, 5 for Web Swing for Lucky Blocks.

[QOL] A Universal Time vs Web Swing for Lucky Blocks — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals