[QOL 3] A Universal Time vs Animal Simulator

Animal Simulator currently leads with 2,530 concurrent players against 1,203, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Animal Simulator at 5,531 concurrent players, versus 2,466. Momentum favours Animal Simulator: +0.1% week over week versus -1.4% for [QOL 3] A Universal Time. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 989.3M). Full side-by-side history for [QOL 3] A Universal Time and Animal Simulator is charted above.

[QOL 3] A Universal Time
1,203
playing now
2,142 24h peak · 989.3M visits
VS
Animal Simulator
2,530
playing now
5,008 24h peak · 1.6B visits

Player count history

[QOL 3] A Universal TimeAnimal Simulator

Head to head

Metric [QOL 3] A Universal Time Animal SimulatorDifference
Playing now1,2032,5301,327 (2.1×)
24h peak2,1425,0082,866 (2.3×)
24h average1,5863,4631,877 (2.2×)
7-day peak2,1755,0082,833 (2.3×)
7-day average1,5813,7142,133 (2.3×)
30-day peak2,1755,0082,833 (2.3×)
All-time peak2,4665,5313,065 (2.2×)
24h change 12.9% 8.7%
7d change 1.4% 0.1%
Total visits989.3M1.6B583.3M (1.6×)
Visits (24h)82.8K317.8K235K (3.8×)
Visits (7d)581.7K2.2M1.6M (3.8×)
Favorites1.4M1.8M399.1K
Rating86.1%83.6%
Global rank (players)#935#474of 8,338
Trending score1.0-23.8
CreatedJun 3, 2020Sep 20, 2020
GenreRPGRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for [QOL 3] A Universal Time, 14 for Animal Simulator.